Mid-Pripyat
Country: Belarus
Area: 93,062.15 ha
National protection status: Nature Reserve
International protection status: Emerald Network* (BY0000005) – Srednyaya Pripyat (95,488.1 ha); Ramsar Site (BY1090) – Mid-Pripyat National Landscape Zakaznik (93,062 ha); IBA (BY017) – Mid Prypiac` (98,674 ha).
* After denunciation of accession to the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, de jure there are no Emerald Network sites in Belarus.
The area is a fragment of the Pripyat River valley in its middle course, about 120 km long, from the mouth of the Jasielda to the mouth of the Scviga, and with a width of 4 to 14 km. The surface of the floodplain is flat, sometimes rugged, and the riverbed is strongly meandering. The Pripyat floodplain is one of the largest low-disturbed protected areas of this type in Europe. About 35% of the area is afforested. The grasslands of the reserve, ranging from wet to upland, cover about 30% of its area. Open wetlands make up about 20% of the area, with well-preserved lowland fens of exceptional value, some of which have been transformed as a result of land reclamation and are used as hayfields, pastures and arable land. The numerous and inaccessible overgrown oxbow lakes and floodplain lakes, which occupy about 3% of the area, play a special role in maintaining the biological and landscape diversity of the site. The area is characterised by regular and long spring floods lasting from one to several months. The floodplain along the entire river is then flooded from 1 to 4-5 km wide.
>100 000
individuals of migratory bird species registered on spring migration
30
habitats included
in the Resolution #4 of the Standing Commission to the Bern Convention
>100
species included in the Resolution #6 of the Standing Committee to the Bern Convention
Land cover
Forests
Grasslands
Open wetlands
Oxbow lakes and floodplain lakes
Others
Biodiversity and natural values
Biotopes
The territory is a unique river valley with an exceptional richness of meadow, forest and wetland habitats. More than 30 habitats included in the Resolution No. 4 of the Standing Committee to the Bern Convention have been identified here, more than a half of this territory is particularly important for their conservation in Belarus. These natural habitats are Floating frogbit rafts (3150), Floating colonies of bladderwort (3150), Floating mats of Salvinia natans (3150), Free-floating vegetation of eutrophic waters (3150), Eutrophic vegetation of slow-flowing rivers (3260), Species-poor beds of low-growing water-fringed or amphibious vegetation (3130), Sparsely vegetated river gravel banks, Euro-Siberian dwarf annual amphibian meadows (3270), Beds of large sedges usually without standing water (7210), Moist or wet eutrophic and mesotrophic grasslands (6440), Riverine willow woods (91Е0), Mixed oak-elm-ash woods of large rivers (91F0), Oak-ash-hornbeam woods on eutrophic and mesotrophic soils (9170), and others.
Biodiversity
The vegetation cover supports at least 725 plant species; wildlife includes more than 1,000 species of insects, 50 species of fish, 6 – reptiles, 12 – amphibians, and 248 species of birds, including 190 nesting species, as well as at least 55 species of mammals. The territory is of great importance for a number of species. The flora and fauna of the area include about 90 protected species of plants and animals. Over 100 species are included into the Resolution No 6 of the Standing Committee to the Bern Convention.
17 protected species of insects are registered in the Nature Reserve, including the Stag Beetle (Lucanus cervus), the Boros Schneideri, the Great Capricorn Beetle (Cerambyx cerdo), the False Ringlet (Coenonympha oedippus), the Danube Clouded Yellow (Colias myrmidone), the Scarce Large Blue (Maculinea teleius), the Water Beetle (Graphoderus bilineatus), the Dark Crimson Underwing (Catocala sponsa) and other species.
The territory is the most important habitat of a number of fish species: the White-finned Gudgeon (Gobio albipinnatus), the Asp (Aspius aspius), the Ukrainian brook lamprey (Eudontomyzon mariae), аs well as of reptiles and amphibians: the European Pond Turtle (Emys orbicularis), the Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus), the Natterjack (Bufo calamita), the Fire-bellied toad (Bombina bombina).
Birds
The Pripyat floodplain is of high international importance for a number of wetland bird species occurring during spring migration; the estimated number of spring migrants is more than 100,000 individuals. More than 1% of Belarusian populations of 27 bird species nest here. Among them are the Bittern (Botaurus stellaris), the Black Stork (Ciconia nigra), the Greater Spotted Eagle (Aquila clanga), theLesser Spotted Eagle (Aquila pomarina), the Honey Buzzard (Pernis apivorus), the Crane (Grus grus), the Corncrake (Crex crex), the Little Crake (Porzana parva), the Great Snipe (Gallinago media), the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax), the Terek Sandpiper (Xenus cinereus), the Black Tern (Chlidonia sniger), the White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos), the Aquatic Warbler (Acrocephalus paludicola), the Azure Tit (Parus cyanus), and others.
The most important impacts and threats
Meadows overgrowing with scrubs
Forest felling, dead wood removal
Spring bird hunting
River straigtening and damming
Grassland ecosystems are threatened by overgrowing with scrubs due to abandonment of haying and grazing, conversion of floodplains to cropland, cereal cultivation, overgrazing by livestock, as well as spring and autumn burning. Damage to forest habitats and species is caused by clear-cutting, sanitary logging, deadwood removal and forest plantation, while wetland ecosystems suffer from riverbed straightening, dredging and damming. In addition, spring hunting is detrimental to waterfowl and wading birds.
Conservation measures
In the National Landscape Reserve Mid-Pripyat, where drainage, construction, clearcut logging as well as some other activities are restricted. A part of protected species’ habitats and valuable biotopes are handed over under the land-users’ protection.
The existing protection regime is not sufficient to preserve species and biotopes. A detailed inventory of rare species’ habitats and handing them over under the land-users’ protection are necessary, as well as consistent monitoring of natural values.